Citizen Kane: Exploring the Greatest Movie
“Citizen Kane.” The title evokes cinematic greatness and acclaim. It may also stir doubts for those who have yet to explore it. Is it the “greatest movie ever made”? What is it about? Why does it inspire discussions and analyses even today?
Diving into "Citizen Kane" resembles a journey up a cinematic mountain. It looms large, legendary, looming over viewers. But worry not! We will guide you through its complex narrative and symbolism. The film's power continues to engage and challenge audiences today.
I. General Information and Plot: Kane's Life Arc
Charles Foster Kane: From Riches to Regret
Our journey begins at the end. We meet the aged Charles Foster Kane. He lives in his lavish estate, Xanadu, in Florida. His last words are “Rosebud.” This word sparks a quest to uncover its meaning, exploring Kane's complex life.
Rise and Legacy: From Tycoon to Baron
The story unfolds through memories of those who knew Kane. He rises quickly; a young man inherits a fortune and buys a newspaper. This marks his ascent to media mogul. He doesn't just report the news; he seeks to create it, to shape opinions. Orson Welles plays Kane with charm and arrogance.
Wealth and Power: A Faustian Bargain?
Kane's tale isn't merely rags-to-riches. It's a riches-to-wretchedness exploration of power's corrupting influence. The film suggests that his relentless quest for control consumes his soul. He becomes isolated, surrounded by possessions yet devoid of connection. By life's end, he sees that his unhappiness began when he “lost Rosebud.”
The film doesn't shy away from wealth's allure but shows its corrosive effects. Kane's story warns that money can't buy true happiness or love. This belief leads to profound sadness, demonstrated through Kane's life.
Xanadu: A Monument to Isolation
Kane's Estate: A Palatial Prison
Xanadu, Kane's estate, is more than a setting; it is a character itself. This grand palace exemplifies Kane’s solitude. Its design echoes Hearst Castle, showcasing excess. Think of sprawling grounds and exotic animals. But beneath the surface lies emptiness mirroring Kane's spirit. Xanadu becomes a prison, revealing his inability to find contentment.
Symbolism of Lavishness: Foolish Excess
Xanadu symbolizes the pitfalls of extravagant lifestyles. It represents foolish excess, warning against valuing material wealth over real human traits. This gilded cage highlights the emptiness beneath immense wealth. Kane's Xanadu isn't a home; it's a mausoleum for his lost dreams.
The Ending: The "Rosebud" Revelation
"Rosebud" Revelation: A Sled’s Significance
The film’s climax revolves around "Rosebud." This word unlocks Kane's life’s mystery. Spoiler alert: "Rosebud" refers to Kane's childhood sled. Simple, yet deeply symbolic.
“Rosebud” embodies lost innocence and simpler times before wealth complicated everything. The irony lies in his life’s achievements and the longing for a childhood sled. This underscores the film's theme: what we chase—wealth and power—can be unsatisfying compared to simpler joys.
Themes of Loss and Meaning: A Haunting View
The ending offers a haunting look into loss and meaning. It reflects on happiness and fulfillment's elusive nature. The burning sled symbolizes the irretrievable loss of Kane's childhood. This stark image lingers after the film ends, prompting contemplation about what truly matters in life.
II. Character Analysis: Those Around Kane
Charles Foster Kane: The Enigmatic Core
Ambition and Its Cost: Is It Worth It?
Charles Foster Kane embodies ambition, driven by a desire for achievement, domination, and love. But "Citizen Kane" explores ambition's cost. The film shows that this pursuit leads to sacrificing life's simplest joys, destroying genuine relationships and happiness.
The burning of "Rosebud" reminds viewers to consider the cost of ambition. Are we chasing dreams that leave us empty? Are we giving up present happiness for a future that may never meet our expectations?
Power and Its Corrupting Effects: A Warning
"Citizen Kane" serves as a cautionary tale about power's corrupt nature. It's a clear message delivered through nuanced storytelling. The film explores how power can distort perspectives, erode empathy, and isolate individuals. Pursuing power might destroy the soul, leaving a hollow existence like Kane’s.
Desire for Love: A Thirst Unfulfilled
Underneath ambition lies a deep desire for love in Charles Foster Kane. He seeks admiration and adoration but fails to reciprocate love genuinely. His need for validation hinders his ability to form genuine connections. Kane emerges as a child deprived of his mother's love, experiencing intense longing for validation without nurturing empathy.
Mary Kane (Kane's Mother): The Deciding Moment
Decision to Give Up Charles: A Mother’s Sacrifice?
Mary Kane, Charles's mother, highlights significant decisions in his life.
plays a crucial role in shaping his destiny. Her choice to give up her son to Walter Parks Thatcher, a banker, changes everything. "Presumably to give her son a better life," Mary Kane makes this choice. It’s born out of love, a complex expression of it. She believes by trusting Charles to Thatcher, she secures his future, offering opportunities she cannot provide.
The scene where Mary Kane signs over guardianship is pivotal. It’s charged with emotion, hinting at the pain of separation and her decision's weight. She gives up her son. In her mind, she’s granting him a chance at a life filled with education and opportunity.
Reasons for the Decision: Wealth and a "Better Life"
The catalyst for Mary Kane's decision is the gold discovery on their property. This sudden wealth leads to the severing of family ties. The "Kanes' fortunes quickly turned when gold was discovered in the mine," and with this comes Mary's perceived necessity to secure Charles’s future through formal education and a wealthy guardian. She believes sending him away is "the only way to secure his future," providing a life far from their "poor, rural environment." It’s a mother’s sacrifice, driven by hope for a brighter future, despite sacrificing their present together.
Emily (Kane's First Wife): A Casualty of Kane's Ego
Divorce and Death: A Tragic End
Emily, Kane's first wife, is a figure in the background. Her story serves as an example of collateral damage from Kane's self-centeredness. Their marriage deteriorates, ending in divorce. Shortly after, "Emily divorces Kane shortly afterward and dies two years later, along with their son, in a car accident." This tragic event is not Kane's fault directly, but it highlights his actions' ripple effects and the broken relationships in his wake. Emily and her son become casualties of his ambition and inability to maintain genuine intimacy.
Susan Alexander: The Opera Singer and Kane's Second Wife
Relationship with Kane: Control and Manipulation
Susan Alexander, Kane's second wife, plays a more prominent role in the story. She offers greater insight into Kane's manipulative nature. Their relationship begins under scandalous conditions. "While campaigning for governor, Kane, a married man, is caught in an inappropriate relationship with a lounge singer, Susan." This affair foreshadows Kane's pattern of using and controlling those around him.
At that time, portraying Susan Alexander was controversial. It was seen as a thinly veiled depiction of William Randolph Hearst's real-life partner, Marion Davies. This fueled Hearst's animosity towards the film.
Susan’s story unfolds through her interview with Thompson, revealing the suffocating nature of her relationship with Kane. After her disastrous opera career—managed by Kane—she attempts suicide. This act highlights the immense pressure he places on her, trying to mold her into a reflection of himself.
Reasons for Leaving Kane: Reclaiming Identity
Susan ultimately leaves Kane, driven by desperation. "She grows bitter when he pressures her to become someone he believes is more suited to his station." His insistence on making Susan an opera star, despite her lack of talent or desire, exemplifies his controlling nature. He tries to "force others to see her as he does," nearly driving her to suicide. Kane's efforts to control her rob her of identity. "The only way she can save herself is to leave him." Her departure is self-preservation, an attempt to reclaim her identity and escape Kane's grasp. She leaves not out of malice but necessity.
III. "Rosebud": The Heart of the Mystery
Meaning and Symbolism: Unlocking "Rosebud"
Childhood Innocence: A Lost Paradise
"Rosebud," the film’s central enigma, is filled with symbolism. Fundamentally, it represents "childhood innocence." It evokes nostalgia for a simpler time before adulthood's complexities corrupt it. The sled reminds one of carefree play, warmth, and joy—a stark contrast to Kane's cold adult world.
Happier Times: Nostalgia for SimplicityMother's Love: A Deep Connection
"Rosebud" also embodies "mother's love," the affection and security of Kane's early years. The sled connects him to Mary Kane and the home he left behind. It represents the nurturing love that might be the only genuine connection Kane ever experienced. The loss of "Rosebud" signifies the loss of that bond and security.
Lost Control of Destiny: A Turning Point
For Kane, "Rosebud" symbolizes "lost control of destiny." He realizes that everything changed when he was separated from his family. "Kane recognizes it all began when he lost Rosebud." His removal from home marks a pivotal moment—a loss of agency that fuels his obsession with power later. His pursuit of control is a futile attempt to regain security lost with "Rosebud." For deeper insight into its significance, Britannica provides a thorough analysis: What is the significance of “Rosebud” in Citizen Kane? | Britannica.
Revelation in the Ending: The Sled's Name
Sled's Name: Unveiling the Secret
The climax of "Citizen Kane" reveals that 'Rosebud' is the name of a sled Charles Foster Kane played with as a boy. This simple fact unlocks the film’s emotional core. "Until 'Rosebud' is revealed as his childhood sled," the mystery propels the narrative forward. The reveal isn't just a twist; it offers poignant insight into Kane's yearning for something he could never recapture.
Burning of Rosebud: The Final Loss
Symbol of the Loss of His Entire Childhood: Irretrievable Past
The film concludes with "Rosebud" burning. This act signifies "the loss of his entire childhood." The flames consume not just a sled but the last tangible link to his past, his mother's love, and simpler times long gone. As the sled burns with "Rosebud" emblazoned, it represents "the loss of his entire childhood and the life he could have led." This visual representation conveys irretrievable loss—a poignant ending encapsulating Charles Foster Kane's life tragedy.
IV. Technical and Artistic Aspects: Groundbreaking Innovation
Cinematography (Gregg Toland): Revolutionizing Visual Storytelling
Deep-Focus Photography: Sharpness and Depth
"Citizen Kane" is narratively innovative; it's a technical marvel due to Gregg Toland's groundbreaking cinematography. The film is celebrated for its "groundbreaking cinematography," especially its pioneering use of "deep-focus photography." This technique allowed “multiple planes of the image to be in focus simultaneously.” Imagine scenes where both
The foreground and background remain sharp. This depth of field immerses viewers in the scene. It allows complex storytelling within one frame. This advancement enriched the film's visual language. It added layers of meaning to each shot.
Lighting and Focusing Methods: Innovation in Technique
Beyond deep-focus, Toland's innovative lighting and focusing methods were crucial. His techniques went beyond technical skill. They used light and focus to enhance the narrative. Toland created mood and directed the viewer's attention. Welles acknowledged Toland's immense contribution. His techniques still influence filmmakers now. Toland's mastery elevated Citizen Kane to a visually stunning experience. For more on Welles's techniques and the drama of the film, check Biography.com: Orson Welles and the Drama Surrounding 'Citizen Kane' | Biography.
Editing (Robert Wise): Dynamic and Layered Narrative
Jump Cuts: Disrupting Time
Editing by Robert Wise is vital to "Citizen Kane's" style. He used jump cuts, which skip forward in time, adding a unique rhythm. These cuts were rare then. Their use caused fragmentation, echoing the disordered nature of Kane's life.
Overlapping Dialogue: Realism and Depth
Wise employed overlapping dialogue. Characters often speak over each other, mimicking genuine conversation. This technique creates dynamism and layered information. Jump cuts and overlapping dialogue added depth and energy. Wise crafted a narrative flow that was unconventional and groundbreaking.
Narrative Structure: Non-Linear Storytelling
Non-Linear Storytelling: A Puzzle to Piece Together
Citizen Kane is famous for its non-linear narrative structure. The story unfolds through flashbacks from various perspectives. This fragmented approach was revolutionary and remains a hallmark of the film. The viewer becomes a detective, piecing together Kane's life from conflicting accounts. Non-linear narrative reflects memory's complexity and ambiguity.
Flashbacks from Different Perspectives: Layered Truth
Flashbacks from different perspectives are crucial. Each flashback offers a character's memory and biases, creating a multifaceted portrait of Kane. The narrative is a puzzle for viewers to piece together. This technique illustrates memory's subjective nature. We do not receive one definitive truth about Kane, but rather a mosaic of perspectives.
V. Controversies and Challenges: Battles Beyond the Screen
William Randolph Hearst: The Real-Life Shadow
Thinly-Veiled Biopic: Mirroring a Media Mogul
The creation of Citizen Kane faced turbulence. It became embroiled in controversy because it resembled media mogul William Randolph Hearst. Kane mirrored Hearst's extravagant lifestyle and political influence. This inspiration made Hearst a serious adversary.
Hearst's Boycott and Retaliation: Media Warfare
Hearst's anger was fierce. He utilized his media empire for retaliation. He boycotted the film, using his newspapers to criticize it. They attempted to hinder its release and disparaged Welles. This media assault heavily impacted the film. Hearst's newspapers used Welles' private life against him, and theaters refused to show it. The film flopped at the box office, causing substantial losses for RKO due to Hearst's influence.
Authorship Dispute: Who Wrote Kane?
Another controversy involves the authorship dispute over the screenplay. Credit is shared between Welles and Herman J. Mankiewicz. This led to debate on their contributions to the story. The question remains contentious among scholars.
Blacklisting: Silencing the Press
Hearst's Suppression of Press Coverage: Media Blackout
Hearst's retaliation bordered on censorship. He blacklisted press coverage related to Citizen Kane in his publications. This blackout diminished the film’s visibility. Even design elements inspired by Hearst Castle provoked ire, leading him to suppress mentions of the film across his media outlets.
Reactions and Snubs: A Cold Reception
Booed at the Oscars: Hollywood's Discomfort
Despite critical acclaim, Citizen Kane received a cold reception in Hollywood. At the Academy Awards, it faced boos. This hostility arose from insiders envious of Welles' youth and talent. The primary reason was its portrayal of Hearst, a powerful Hollywood figure. The boos highlighted the film’s controversial nature within the industry.
VI. Critical Reception and Legacy: From Flop to Film History
Considered One of the Greatest Films: Enduring Acclaim
Technical Innovation: Groundbreaking Techniques
Despite initial controversy, Citizen Kane is now hailed as one of the greatest films ever made. Its acclaim is rooted in groundbreaking cinematography and innovative narrative structure. These techniques were revolutionary for their time. Citizen Kane remains a landmark in cinema, studied and celebrated among filmmakers.
Thematic Depth: Timeless Themes
Beyond technical prowess, Citizen Kane showcases thematic depth. It explores power, isolation, and the pursuit of wealth. These themes resonate across generations, maintaining relevance today. Kane's story remains a cautionary tale about the human condition and endeavors for meaning.
Influence on Filmmaking: A Cinematic Landmark
Citizen Kane's influence on filmmaking is immense. Its innovative techniques greatly affected future cinema. Its narrative structure inspired countless movies since its release. Welles' willingness to push boundaries challenges generations of filmmakers to explore new storytelling formats.
Awards and Recognition: Oscar and Beyond
Oscar Wins and Nominations: Acknowledgment, Despite Snubs
Despite backlash, Citizen Kane received recognition at the Academy Awards.
Awards. It "won one Academy Award for Best Original Screenplay in 1942." It received nine nominations in total. These included Best Picture, Best Director, and Best Actor. The screenplay award was its only win. Many see this as a significant snub. The film has since gained acclaim and legacy. Nominations recognized its artistic merit amidst controversies.
Box Office Performance: From Flop to Rediscovery
Initial Flop: Box Office FailureLater Recognition: Rediscovery and Acclaim
"Citizen Kane's" failure is not the end. "The film saw re-release in the mid-1950s." It gained public attention once again. French critics praised the film, recognizing it at international events. "In 1989, the Library of Congress added Citizen Kane to the National Film Registry." This recognition solidified its cultural significance. The film transformed from a flop into a masterpiece, proving greatness takes time. Its journey shows enduring power and artistic merit.
VII. Is Citizen Kane Worth Watching? The Enduring Question
Perfectly Enjoyable Film: Beyond the Hype
Is "Citizen Kane" worth watching? Yes. Despite its dense reputation, "Citizen Kane is a perfectly enjoyable film." It offers a compelling story with "well-written and believable characters" along with "a fair bit of good humour." The film goes beyond technical execution; it's emotionally resonant drama.
Innovative Filmmaking Techniques: A Masterclass in Cinema
Even if "not to everyone's taste," "Citizen Kane" is worth watching for its "innovative filmmaking techniques." It represents a masterclass in storytelling. It showcases "groundbreaking cinematography and non-linear narrative." For anyone interested in film history and technique, "Citizen Kane" is vital viewing.
Groundbreaking Cinematography and Non-Linear Narrative Structure: Visual and Narrative Innovation
The film’s "groundbreaking cinematography and non-linear narrative" make it worthwhile. These elements enhance storytelling and impact. "Citizen Kane" pushed cinematic boundaries. Its innovations continue to inspire filmmakers today.
Worth Watching, Even if It's Not to Everyone's Taste: A Cinematic Landmark
Ultimately, "Citizen Kane" is "considered worth watching." It's a landmark in cinema history. This film ranks among the greatest ever made. Some view it as "dated due to age and pacing." Still, its artistic merit, technical brilliance, and thematic depth remain strong. Those willing to engage will find "Citizen Kane" offers a rich cinematic experience.
Responses (0 )