Exodus: Gods and Kings: Biblical Epic or Hollywood Flop? Let's Dissect This Desert Mirage
Ah, "Exodus: Gods and Kings." Directed by Ridley Scott and starring Christian Bale, it promised epic. But was it? We will dissect this 2014 film retelling the Exodus story. It's a journey marked by pitfalls, different from what the Israelites faced escaping Egypt.
Biblical Accuracy: Loosely Inspired, Heavily Embellished
How much of "Exodus: Gods and Kings" is actually biblical? Almost none. A summary said that while there was a boat named Exodus and Jewish refugees, most of it lacks historical facts. Ouch. It's like claiming a horror movie about a haunted toaster is based on breakfast.
Truth vs. Hollywood: If you wanted a faithful rendition of the Old Testament, you may need to adjust your expectations. It's more a Hollywood action movie. It borrowed names and vague plot points from the Bible. The liberties taken are as wild as a toddler with crayons on a white wall.
Old Testament Deviations: The film gets creative with the narrative. Moses's life story? Altered. His character? Reinterpreted. God's depiction? Less "pillar of fire," more "petulant schoolboy." And there's a crocodile plague. Yes, crocodiles. They aimed for dramatic effect, but it missed subtlety.
Historical Embellishments: The movie is "inspired by" the Old Testament story, but it rewrites history like a teenager writing fanfiction. It’s more a reimagining, with biblical events as mere suggestions. Think biblical fan fiction with a blockbuster budget.
Zionist Perspective and Egyptian Ban: If you thought biblical accuracy was the main issue, think again. Egypt banned the film not for its theology, but for presenting history from a "Zionist viewpoint." According to EGYNews, the film is Zionist propaganda posed as a biblical epic. A double whammy, indeed.
Reception: Not Exactly a Blockbuster Hit
How was "Exodus: Gods and Kings?" Critics mostly shrugged, saying, "not really." Despite visuals and Ridley Scott, it landed with a thud in the critical arena. It's a movie that looks impressive in trailers yet leaves viewers empty afterward. Like a gift box full of plain beige socks.
Critical Consensus: Not a Good Movie: The AI overview sums it up: "generally considered not a good movie by critics." That’s not what you want on your Blu-ray cover. Complaints include a "weak story," "poor character development," and "whitewashing." It hit almost every box critics despise.
Mixed Bag of Reviews: "Mixed" feels generous. More like a bag of rotten fruit with bruised apples. Some positive aspects were mentioned but overall disappointment reigned. Picture dining on Michelin-star presentation but tasting cafeteria food.
Praised Aspects: The Eye Candy: Fair enough, not *all* bad. Critics noted some redeeming qualities, especially technical aspects. "Acting performances" received nods, though even Liam Neeson could perform without trying hard. The "visuals," "production design," and "cinematography" were all praised. Ridley Scott knows how to make films look amazing. But narratively... less so.
Criticized Aspects: The Story and Everything Else: Now for the fun part – the grievances list. "Pacing," "thin screenwriting," "wooden dialogue," "slow tempo," "screenplay deficiencies," and "casting choices." Critics noted pacing slower than Moses leading his flock. Screenwriting felt “thin,” or "devoid of substance." Dialogue? More like petrified wood. Weak story? Indeed. It's like trying to construct a pyramid from wet noodles.
Missed Opportunity and Disappointment: The overall verdict? A "missed opportunity." It’s the equivalent of ordering gourmet and receiving a microwaved dinner instead. Ridley Scott and a massive budget raised expectations, yet audiences got something else entirely.
Plot: Moses vs. Ramses, Round Two
Plot time. If you avoided the Bible and this film, here’s the gist. "Exodus: Gods and Kings" retells the Exodus story: Moses, Pharaoh, plagues, Red Sea parting, all of it. But with more brooding Christian Bale and Joel Edgerton as a vaguely menacing Ken doll.
What's the Movie About? The Basics: In broad strokes, it's about "Moses and the Hebrew exodus after 400 years of slavery." Epic in theory but mixed to negative reception.
Moses's Rise Against Ramses: The movie centers on conflict between "Egyptian Princes Moses and Ramses," raised as brothers. Ramses becomes Pharaoh and Moses his trusted advisor. But Moses discovers his heritage. Ramses banishes him, often a death sentence. God has other plans; Moses must free the Israelites.
Six Hundred Thousand...Really?:The film claims "six hundred thousand slaves" escaped Egypt. That’s a lot of extras and sandals. The biblical number's historical accuracy is debatable, but for cinema, it sounds impressive. Imagine feeding 600,000 people across a desert! No wonder they wandered for 40 years.
They were likely seeking a good rest stop.
The Ten Plagues: God's Fury (or Ridley Scott's Effects): You can’t have an Exodus tale without the Ten Plagues. "Exodus: Gods and Kings" gives us the blood, frogs, lice, flies, livestock pestilence, boils, hail, locusts, darkness, and the final, dreadful death of firstborns. These plagues were God’s way of convincing Pharaoh to release his people. Pharaoh was stubborn, getting more irritated until the last plague changed everything. A story of divine bargaining through extreme pest control.
Message of the Movie: Breaking Free (and Records, Maybe...): What’s the takeaway of "Exodus: Gods and Kings"? One promoter claimed it’s about "breaking bonds in life." Is that profound? It's a universal message, vague and meaningless. It could apply to almost any film. Breaking bonds! Profound, right? Or just escaping slavery. Or maybe it's about good visual effects. The message is a bit murky.
Casting: When Hollywood Went Fair
Ah, casting. The gift of controversy. "Exodus: Gods and Kings" stirred a hornet's nest with its choices, especially the pale complexion of its main cast. It seems they held auditions in Scandinavia. The outcome? A film in Egypt with mostly white actors. Cue the accusations of "whitewashing."
Main Characters: A Roster of Pale Faces: Let’s review the cast. Moses? Christian Bale. Ramses? Joel Edgerton. Tuya, Ramses's mother? Sigourney Weaver. Minor roles like Nun filled by Ben Kingsley. And God? Portrayed by 11-year-old Isaac Andrews. Yes, God is a child. And white. Apparently, divinity prefers a complexion. It’s as if the casting director saw "Egypt" and thought to get Brits and Aussies.
Whitewashing Controversy: Accidental or Intentional?: The whitewashing uproar was no gentle murmur, but a loud roar. Critics condemned the film for casting mostly white actors in Egyptian roles. This isn't just about history; it's about representation, or the absence of it. A story in North Africa with expected characters of color had white actors. It feels tone-deaf and offensive. Some argued it was following Hollywood tradition as if that justifies problematic casting. Others cited market-driven reasons. Regardless, casting became contentious and hurt the film's reception. The decision has aged poorly.
Director's Chair: Ridley Scott's Take on Faith
Behind every film is a director. Behind "Exodus: Gods and Kings," there's Ridley Scott. Known for his visuals, epic sensibilities, and his atheism. His personal beliefs seeped into the film, leading to a non-religious, skeptical view of the biblical tale.
Religious Views: Atheism and Doubt: Ridley Scott openly calls himself an atheist and has a "generally negative view of religion." This is an interesting choice for a biblical epic director. It’s like hiring a cat to make a dog ownership documentary. His doubt about faith is clear in the film. Moses appears less as a prophet and more as a doubtful revolutionary. He occasionally hears voices, be it divine or childlike.
Scientific vs. Religious View: Logic vs. Faith: Scott's take on the Exodus wasn’t reverent. He sought "scientific" explanations for miracles instead of embracing the faith narrative. In this film, the plagues are shown as natural disasters, losing divine essence. Scott wanted to demystify miracles, making them rational. For a biblical epic, that’s like a superhero movie where powers come from good vitamins.
Most Successful Film: The Martian (Why?): Unsurprisingly, Ridley Scott's "most successful" movie isn’t biblical. It's "The Martian," a sci-fi tale of science overcoming adversity. Perhaps this highlights his strengths and preferences as a director. His skepticism suits stories of human ingenuity better than those of divine deeds.
Historical Context: Exploring the Biblical Background!
Let’s step back and explore the historical context of the Exodus story and Moses.
Who is Moses? A Central Prophet: Moses is a significant prophet in Judaism, Christianity, Islam, and various other Abrahamic faiths. In these beliefs, he's not just historical but foundational, guiding the Israelites from slavery and receiving the Ten Commandments from God. Portraying him as conflicted is quite a decision.
Moses's Wives: Zipporah and The Cushite Aspect: Moses had relationships. According to the Bible, he married Zipporah, Jethro's daughter. In "Exodus: Gods and Kings," Zipporah appears but plays a minor role. Interestingly, he also married a "Cushite woman," often thought to be Ethiopian. This adds complexity and challenges the "whiteness" around biblical figures.
Zipporah's Circumcision Action: A Scriptural Quirk: There’s an unusual biblical story where Zipporah circumcises Gershom to save Moses from wrath. Yes, divine anger averted by circumcision! It's a strange passage from Exodus 4:24-26 that highlights Zipporah’s agency in protecting her family. "Exodus: Gods and Kings" likely avoided this oddity. Probably wise; imagine pitching that scene!
The Ten Plagues: Divine Catastrophes: The Ten Plagues are vital. They aren't random disasters; they serve as divine judgments against Egypt to persuade Pharaoh to free the Israelites. Each plague escalates to the firstborn's death, breaking Pharaoh's resistance. They showcase divine power and change God's relationship with Moses and Pharaoh.
The Pharaoh: Ramses II, The Stubborn: The film names Ramses II as Pharaoh. Whether Ramses II was *the* Pharaoh of the Exodus is debated among scholars. The Bible doesn't give a name. Yet Ramses II is plausible, given his era and reign's scale. In the movie, Ramses II is depicted as proud, arrogant, and tragic, ultimately clashing with Moses and divine wrath.
Production: Filming for the Exodus
Creating "Exodus: Gods and Kings" is ambitious. It calls for vast sets, elaborate costumes, and convincing locations for ancient Egypt.
Filming Locations: From Pinewood to Other Sites: Most interior
Work was done at Pinewood Studios in London. This is a staple for Hollywood studio shoots. The production also moved to various locations to capture the exterior grandeur of ancient Egypt. Behind-the-scenes footage showed filming took place in many different spots. Arthur Max, the production designer, mentions starting at Pinewood for interior scenes. Specific external locations aren't clearly outlined in the snippets. Overall, it conveys a production that spanned multiple locales. It aimed to achieve visual scope and authenticity, or at least, Hollywood's version of it.
Reasons for Failure: The Exodus from the Box Office
Despite the epic scale and star power, "Exodus: Gods and Kings" did not perform well at the box office. The film fell flat critically, as we’ve noted before. What caused this? A dissection of reasons reveals a cinematic exodus from success.
Why Did It Flop? A Perfect Storm of Criticism: The failure of the movie arose from multiple factors. The mixed reviews from critics did not help its cause. Negative word-of-mouth can deter audiences. Criticisms of pacing and weak writing played a role in its downfall. It’s like building a grand temple on flimsy foundations. Eventually, it will crumble.
Character Development and Screenplay: The Fatal Flaws: The recurring culprits were the lack of character development and screenplay issues. Critics identified these weaknesses consistently. Characters felt flat; dialogue came off as wooden. The story lacked depth. In a biblical epic, compelling characters and a resonant plot are key to engaging the audience. Many say "Exodus: Gods and Kings" failed to deliver on both counts. The film is visually striking, but without a strong emotional core or relatable characters, it feels empty and forgettable.
Related Movies: Exodus Cinematic Universe (Not Really)
"Exodus: Gods and Kings" is not the first film on the Exodus story. It won’t be the last either. However, another film of interest came from a different era and had a different focus.
Exodus (1960): The Classic Version: Another film called "Exodus" came out in 1960. Yet this film does not address Moses or Pharaoh. It is an American epic drama about the founding of Israel. Directed by Otto Preminger, it draws from a novel by Leon Uris. This version discusses post-World War II events and the creation of Israel, focusing on a refugee ship named "Exodus." While sharing a title and theme of exodus, the 1960 film tells a different story. It roots itself in 20th-century history, not biblical narrative. The title "Exodus" carries broader meanings beyond the Old Testament, tying together themes of departure and nation-building.
Banning: Not Welcome in Egypt
Let’s revisit the fact that "Exodus: Gods and Kings" faced a ban in Egypt. This is notable since Egypt is the setting for the Exodus story. Why was it banned? Political sensitivities and historical interpretations likely contributed.
Why Banned in Egypt? Zionist Viewpoint and Historical Forgery: Egypt banned the film because it was seen as portraying history through a "Zionist viewpoint." This viewpoint implies that Egyptian authorities felt the film favored the Israelite perspective, overshadowing the Egyptian narrative. The "historical forgery" claim likely arises from significant deviations from the biblical account and established historical interpretations. The casting controversy also played a part. Consequently, Egypt viewed "Exodus: Gods and Kings" not just as a poor movie, but as politically and culturally offensive. Ouch. That's a ban with impact.
In conclusion, "Exodus: Gods and Kings." It is visually stunning yet narratively lacking, critically dismissed, and politically contentious. A film aimed for grandeur but ended up feeling bland. Like beige socks. Perhaps Hollywood should focus on less controversial themes next time. Perhaps haunted toasters will receive less backlash.
Responses (0 )