Risen: A Biblical Epic or Hollywood Hijinks? Unpacking the Easter Mystery Through Roman Eyes
Hollywood always seizes a resurrection tale. In 2016, "Risen" appeared, offering a different take on the famous comeback: Jesus's resurrection. Does this film meet expectations? Or does it falter on its creative choices? Let's explore this cinematic journey, examining faith and a missing Messiah.
Fact vs. Faith: "Risen"'s Biblical Report Card - Needs Improvement
Let's clarify: "Risen" plays fast and loose with scripture. If you expect a word-for-word visual gospel, prepare for a detour.
Critics and theologians raised eyebrows at the film's interpretation of biblical events. It's a ‘fictionalized account,’ which is Hollywood's code for some liberties taken. It's like historical fan fiction but with a big budget.
The movie centers on Clavius, a Roman tribune seeking the truth of Jesus' missing body. Sounds intriguing. However, the Bible does not mention any such investigation. It adds a detective layer to the Nativity scene – entertaining yet historically dubious.
The Gospels detail accounts from Jesus' followers: Mary Magdalene, Peter, and the apostles. "Risen" sidesteps this by using Clavius, the skeptical Roman outsider. This narrative choice sacrifices scriptural integrity for drama. Fair trade? Debatable, like whether pineapple belongs on pizza.
Mary Magdalene appears as a former prostitute. The Gospels do not explicitly state this. Tradition marked her this way, but modern scholarship offers a nuanced view. The movie chooses drama over doctrine, adding to its overall fictional tone.
Worth the Price of Admission? Surprisingly, Yes.
Despite its flexible relationship with biblical accuracy, "Risen" is surprisingly watchable. It feels like that dish at a restaurant that’s not what you expected, but you enjoy it anyway. It's not biblical steak, but a tasty cinematic burger.
The film presents a fresh angle. It shows the resurrection story through a Roman soldier's eyes. This skeptic's task to debunk the miracle is compelling. It offers viewers a fresh approach, even if Clavius's actual existence is questionable.
Joseph Fiennes plays Clavius well, embodying a man weary from empire life, searching for truth. Tom Felton provides an enthusiastic sidekick. Their performances anchor the narrative in human experience, adding weight to Clavius’s quest even if he is fictional.
For a faith-based film, "Risen" avoids being preachy or overly sentimental. It addresses doubt and belief engagingly, appealing even to skeptics. It aims to connect with everyone, including those checking their watches.
In faith-based film circles, often marked by poor production values, "Risen" distinguishes itself. It offers decent production, competent acting, and an intelligent script despite some liberties. Megan Basham called it "one of the higher-quality faith-based films," which is high praise in that genre.
Easter Movie Material? Maybe for the Inquisitive Mind
Is "Risen" the new Easter movie? It probably won't replace "The Ten Commandments." Lacking in epic scope and brutality like "The Passion of the Christ," it offers something different: a quieter exploration of resurrection.
While "The Passion" focuses on agonizing final hours of Jesus, "Risen" examines the aftermath of resurrection. Both movies share themes of sacrifice and faith but in greatly different manners.
If you prefer dramatic films, "The Passion" might still be your choice. However, if you're after a film that sparks conversation and offers a new perspective on Easter, "Risen" could prove worthwhile. Bring skepticism and maybe a Bible for fact-checking.
History or Hearsay? The Murky Historical Waters of "Risen"
Let's delve deeper into historical accuracy. "Risen" claims to be a historical drama but misses the mark as much as a centurion with a wristwatch. The core premise—a Roman inquiry into Jesus’ missing body—is pure fiction.
The character Clavius is fictional too. While "Clavius" has historical roots, Clavius Aquila Valerius Niger is a Hollywood creation. He serves to provide outsider insight and offer a protagonist for our mystery. Historical accuracy suffers for cinematic narrative.
So, is "Risen" based on a true story? Technically, yes, in the broadest sense. It draws from Jesus’ resurrection narrative central to Christian faith, but events depicted in "Risen" are fictional embellishments, not rooted in history. It's historical-adjacent entertainment.
Who Was Clavius? The Real vs. Reel Deal
What about the name Clavius? It isn't entirely fabricated. A real individual named Christopher Clavius existed but was not a Roman tribune investigating first-century Judea resurrections. He was a Jesuit astronomer from the 16th century.
Christopher Clavius played a major role in the scientific realm, notably in calendar reform. He was key in developing the Gregorian calendar we use today. So every time you turn your calendar page, remember Clavius – the astronomer, not the fictional tribune.
Clavius's textbooks influenced science for over fifty years. He earned respect from giants like Tycho Brahe and Galileo Galilei. While the fictional Clavius investigates resurrection, the real Clavius advanced our understanding of time and space.
In "Risen," Clavius pursues apostles while questioning miracles. The real Clavius mapped stars and reformed time. Different paths, to say the least.
Clavius is a Roman tribune in Jerusalem, stationed during Jesus' time. After 25 years of service, he is set in his ways. He lacks belief. Pilate tasks him with finding Jesus' missing body, quelling rumors. Clavius embodies logic, yet faces the impossible.
A biblical figure with similarities to Clavius exists. Claudius Lysias, a Roman tribune in Jerusalem, rescues Apostle Paul from a mob. He focuses on law, like Clavius. But Lysias protects Paul, not investigating resurrection. He acknowledges Paul’s innocence, yet violates his rights. So, a Roman in Jerusalem? Yes. Investigating resurrection? Pure fiction.
Plot Twists: Unpacking "Risen"
"Risen" begins with Jesus' crucifixion. The brutality of execution is evident. Then Clavius appears. Pilate calls him to maintain order and investigate rumors of a missing body and a resurrected Messiah. Clavius aims to disprove the impossible.
Clavius, with aide Lucius, starts his inquiry. He interviews witnesses and questions guards. He examines the tomb carefully. The film resembles ancient CSI: Jerusalem. Clavius plays the skeptical detective tackling a puzzling case, but the pieces defy Roman logic.
Clavius encounters the resurrected Jesus, changing his perspective. This meeting becomes pivotal; skepticism starts to crumble. Clavius sees miracles beyond military strategies. His investigation shifts from disproving myth to searching for truth.
In "Risen," Clavius transforms, shedding his hardened persona. He abandons military life for faith. The film ends with Jesus' ascension, leaving Clavius with heavy implications from his experiences. It’s a journey from certainty to uncertainty, from skepticism to faith. A neat arc, though historically... well, you know.
Yeshua, the film's title for Jesus, is placed in a sealed tomb. Guards are there to prevent body snatching. Reports emerge of the boulder moved and the missing body. Clavius's investigation sets the stage, central for the film. These elements align with Gospel accounts, but the Roman inquiry is Hollywood fabrication.
Production Insights: Lights, Camera!
Joseph Fiennes plays Clavius and Tom Felton portrays Lucius. Fiennes is known for his role as Martin Luther in "Luther." Felton, famous as Draco Malfoy from "Harry Potter," adds familiarity to fans. Recognizable talent anchors the faith-based narrative.
The content brief doesn't specifically mention the director and writers. It refers to "three others who had written and produced Risen," suggesting team effort behind the scenes. Knowing these details can provide insight into creative vision, though we will focus on the screen now.
Scenes of apostles post-crucifixion are particularly effective. Filming in Spain and Malta, they capture fear, confusion, and disbelief among the apostles. “Risen” finds compelling moments in human vulnerability and realization, despite the fictionalized plot.
Box Office Insights: "Risen"'s Reception
How did "Risen" perform financially? It was a modest success. With a $20 million budget, it grossed over $46 million worldwide. Not blockbuster figures but respectable for a faith-based film. A solid niche performance.
Critical reception was mixed. Some praised its fresh angle and production values in the faith-based genre. Others focused on historical accuracy, criticizing liberties taken in the narrative. "Risen" didn't gain universal acclaim, but it avoided being panned.
Christian endorsements were enthusiastic. Answers in Genesis declared that "Risen Movie Upholds Scripture," generously interpreting biblical accuracy. Bible film endorsements from prominent leaders occur frequently with varying enthusiasm. Positive reviews from Megan Basham in WORLD and Michael Foust from The Christian Examiner highlight faith-based aspects.
Thematic Threads in "Risen"
"Risen" explores weighty themes hidden beneath the detective plot and historical liberties. Faith stands central to the narrative. Clavius's journey embodies potential faith emerging from his skepticism. The film urges viewers to ponder belief, doubt, and miracles.
Redemption subtly weaves through the story. Clavius evolves from a figure of violence into a transformed man. His experience with resurrected Jesus shifts him from military life to an uncertain future, hinting at redemption's possibility.
Forgiveness emerges throughout the film without overt statements. Resurrection's core message portrays the offer of forgiveness. While focusing on Clavius's journey, the essence of Christ's sacrifice permeates the narrative. Even flawed portrayals touch on these themes, as noted by mentions of forgiveness within "The Movie Risen."
Resurrection Views in Perspective
The resurrection of Jesus is central to Christian belief but has different interpretations. Jehovah's Witnesses view it as spiritual, not physical, asserting he became Archangel Michael post-ascension.
Mormon beliefs offer another perspective. While they believe in Jesus as God's Son and his resurrection, they emphasize God the Father's distinctness from Christ. They assert that Jesus inherited divine powers for overcoming sin and providing salvation.
The term "Godhead" in Mormon belief refers to the Trinity. This represents the unity of purpose among God the Father, Jesus Christ, and the Holy Ghost.
The Resurrection Debate: Physical or... Phantasmal?
The question central to "Risen" and Christianity is the nature of Jesus' resurrection. Was it physical, supported by mainstream Christianity, or spiritual? The Bible, especially the Gospels and Paul's letters, suggests a physical resurrection. The empty tomb, Jesus’ appearances in flesh, and acts like eating and being touched point to a physical reality.
However, views vary. Some embrace a symbolic or spiritual interpretation, focusing on transformation rather than physical evidence. Traditional Christian doctrine remains firm on the physical resurrection, the belief that Jesus’ body returned to life, transformed yet still the same as the crucified body.
The Bible presents accounts from multiple witnesses of the resurrected Jesus: Mary Magdalene, Peter, apostles, and even over 500 believers at once, according to Paul. These witnesses establish the foundation for Christianity's claim of a historical resurrection. Their testimonies, recorded in faith-based texts, serve as evidence for this central miracle.
The tomb adds to this narrative. The Church of the Holy Sepulcher in Jerusalem is believed to be where Jesus was buried and resurrected. Built by Emperor Constantine in the 4th century, it is a site of pilgrimage. Excavations show layers below the church, including Hadrian's temple and Constantine's basilica, enhancing this site's historical complexity.
Moreover, the Garden Tomb is considered the true tomb of Jesus by some Protestants. Discovered in the 19th century, it offers a distinct archaeological and theological perspective. The debate regarding the "true" tomb persists, illustrating the connection between faith, history, and archaeology in the resurrection narrative.
Ultimately, historical evidence for the resurrection is a matter of faith and interpretation. Some claim that historical data supports this belief, citing witness testimonies and early Christianity's rapid growth. Others express skepticism, pointing to historical sources' limitations and challenges in proving miraculous events. "Risen" explores this complex landscape, fictionalizing faith and doubt around the resurrection mystery.
Beyond Clavius: Supporting Characters and Cross Encounters
"Risen" features Clavius and Jesus but includes other characters, some from biblical tradition and others creatively reimagined, like Clavius. Longinus, the Roman centurion, appears in Christian legend as the soldier who pierced Jesus’ side during the crucifixion. Legend holds that Longinus proclaimed, "Truly this man was God's Son!" upon witnessing Jesus’ death.
Further embellishments in Christian tradition suggest Longinus had an eye ailment healed by the water and blood from Jesus’ side. After the resurrection, he reportedly converted to Christianity, adding depth to Roman soldiers’ encounters with the divine.
The Gospels identify several women at the cross: Mary Magdalene, Mary of Clopas, and Mary, mother of Jesus. John the Apostle is also identified as present. These figures witnessed Jesus’ crucifixion and followed his ministry. "Risen," while focusing on Clavius's fictional journey, includes these significant figures within its narrative structure.
In conclusion, "Risen" serves as less of a historical documentary and more of a theological exploration set in a Roman context. It invents characters and prioritizes narrative over strict adherence to the scripture. Despite this, it presents a fresh view on the resurrection story, raising questions about faith and doubt amid Christianity's mystery. Watch for entertainment, reflect on the themes, but keep a Bible handy to fact-check Hollywood’s Easter rendition.
Responses (0 )