Roger Ebert’s Favorite Films: Insights from a Cinema Legend’s Reviews and Ratings

Roger Ebert's World of Cinema: A Deep Dive into the Critic's Mind

Roger Ebert evokes plush theater seats, popcorn smells, and quiet moments before movies start. For years, Ebert was a film critic and cultural companion. He supported the underdogs, critiqued the bad, and examined deeper meanings in popular blockbusters. Let’s explore Ebert’s films, opinions, and legacy.

Decoding Ebert's Star System: A Galaxy of Ratings

Ebert's reviews surpassed simple thumbs up or down. He used a four-star system where half stars altered a film's path. From 1967 to 2013, he analyzed about 10,000 films. Many films received ratings on a four-star scale, with some reaching five stars while others got zero. Some even led to walkouts.

Four-Star Treasures: Overlooked Gems in Ebert's Crown

Four stars from Ebert meant a film was not just good but exceptional. Some of his four-star films might have been overlooked. These films are unique, deserving attention guided by Ebert's sharp vision.

'A Woman's Tale' (1991): A Story of Courage

'A Woman's Tale', from 1991, earned four stars from Ebert. This Australian film by Paul Cox tells the poignant story of a woman battling terminal illness with dignity. It explores life, death, and human spirit. It resonates long after viewing.

'The Whole Shootin' Match' (1978): Indie Spirit

In 1978, 'The Whole Shootin' Match' garnered four stars. Directed by Eagle Pennell, this indie film follows two Texan friends on amusing adventures. It's raw Americana showcasing the independent spirit that Ebert cherished. A cinematic shot of Texas whiskey.

'Guelwaar' (1992): A Cry for Justice

Ebert gave four stars to 'Guelwaar', a 1992 Senegalese film by Ousmane Sembène. It addresses poverty, corruption, and religious tensions in Africa. Sembène, the "father of African cinema," created a politically charged and humanistic film. 'Guelwaar' serves as a wake-up call.

'Wedding in White' (1972): Canadian Drama

From 1972, 'Wedding in White' earned four stars. Directed by William Fruet, this gritty film examines working-class life and the impacts of sexual assault on a young woman. Ebert appreciated its raw depiction of human difficulties.

'The Kite' (2012): Animation with Heart

In 2012, 'The Kite', directed by Halima Ouardiri, received four stars from Ebert. Even later in his career, Ebert embraced all cinema forms. 'The Kite' is beautifully crafted and emotionally resonant, showing stories can often shine in brief moments.

'The Green Wall' (1969): Peruvian Perspective

'The Green Wall', a 1969 Peruvian film by Armando Robles Godoy, also got four stars from Ebert. This psychological drama highlights themes of isolation and nature's clash with civilization. It's a journey into darkness.

'The Revolutionary' (1970): Political Turmoil

In 1970, 'The Revolutionary', directed by Paul Williams, received four stars. Set during student protests in the late 1960s, it examines disillusionment and activism. It remains relevant today regarding social upheaval.

'A Woman's Decision' (1975): East German Drama

'A Woman's Decision', from 1975, is an East German film directed by Eduard Galić. This drama explores life challenges in communist East Germany, particularly facing women's dilemmas. Ebert's rating highlights its artistic significance.

Five-Star Masterpieces: The Pinnacle of Cinematic Achievement

Five stars from Ebert were rare. These films exceeded entertainment and reached artistic heights. They lingered in memory, inviting viewers back for another experience. Let’s explore this elite group.

'The Shawshank Redemption' (1994): Hope Springs Eternal

In 1994, 'The Shawshank Redemption', directed by Frank Darabont, won five stars from Ebert. It's consistently on "best of" lists for its inspiring story of hope and friendship against injustice. This film champions the human spirit amidst despair.

'Spirited Away' (2001): Animated Magic

'Spirited Away', directed by Hayao Miyazaki in 2001, enchanted audiences and Ebert alike. He awarded it five stars for its visual artistry and moving story of growth. Animation can be profound and impactful, showcasing Miyazaki’s mastery.

'The Sting' (1973): A Con Artist's Delight

'The Sting', a 1973 crime film by George Roy Hill, also achieved five stars. With Robert Redford and Paul Newman, it’s filled with suspense and clever twists. It combines sharp writing and performances for smooth enjoyment.

'The Terminator' (1984): Sci-Fi Action Landmark

The 1984 action film 'The Terminator', directed by James Cameron, received five stars from Ebert. Despite his appreciation for art-house films, he recognized this genre-defining classic for its depth and thrilling action.

Zero-Star Fiascos: Ebert's Cinematic Bottom of the Barrel

Now we enter the realm of zero-star films. These were not just bad but irredeemable in Ebert's eyes. Films that failed nearly entirely drew his harshest critiques. It takes a unique disaster to deserve such treatment.

A Rogues' Gallery of Zero-Star Films

Ebert's collection of zero-star films is both fascinating and horrifying. Titles include '10 to Midnight', 'Africa: Blood and Guts', 'An Alan Smithee Film: Burn Hollywood Burn', 'B*A*P*S.' These illustrate wrong turns in cinema ranging from violence exploitation to poor storytelling.

The Walkouts: Films Ebert Couldn't Endure

Also rare was Ebert walking out on a film – a true sign of rejection. He walked out on a few films that he deemed unbearable. It indicated films so unpleasant that Ebert couldn’t finish them. It’s cinematic defeat.

'The Statue' (1971): Comedy Gone Wrong

'The Statue' (1971), directed by Rod Amateau, provoked a walkout from Ebert. He found it devoid of humor and unbearable to watch. Coarse comedies don’t always hit the mark.

can be tragically unfunny. 'The Statue' crossed that line for Ebert.

'Jonathan Livingston Seagull' (1973): Boredom Soaring

'Jonathan Livingston Seagull' (1973) prompted an Ebert walkout. The film's spiritual aim fell flat. Sometimes, soaring seagulls can’t save a crashing film.

'The Brown Bunny' (2003): Infamous Indignation

Vincent Gallo's 'The Brown Bunny' (2003) is the most notorious Ebert walkout. Its graphic content was too much for him. This walkout sparked a heated exchange between Ebert and Gallo, reminding us that criticism can be as dramatic as the movies.

'Tru Loved' (2008): Misguided Message

'Tru Loved' (2008) earned Ebert’s walkout too. It's unclear what prompted it. The film may have suffered from poor execution or a problematic message. Well-intentioned films can miss the mark.

'Mediterraneo' (1991): Italian Island Escape?

Even the Oscar-winning Italian film 'Mediterraneo' (1991) couldn’t hold Ebert's attention. Critically acclaimed, something led him to leave early. Award-winning films aren't always universally appealing.

Ebert's Least Favorite Films: A Gallery of Hates

Besides zero-star films and walkouts, some earned Ebert's ire. He actively disliked these films. It’s interesting to explore a critic's dislikes to understand what sins offend their sensibilities.

The Hall of Shame: Ebert's Most Hated

Ebert's hate list includes diverse cinematic offenders. From action flicks like 'The A-Team', to exploitative documentaries like 'Africa: Blood and Guts' and comedies like 'An Alan Smithee Film: Burn Hollywood Burn', his dislikes spanned genres. Other hated films include 'Alligator', 'Anatomy of Hell', and 'Annapolis'. This shows a critic with broad tastes but clear cinematic boundaries.

'To the Wonder': A Poignant Farewell

Roger Ebert's final review was for 'To the Wonder'. It was published posthumously, just two days after his death in April 2013. This review serves as a farewell to cinema. 'To the Wonder', an experimental drama, was fitting for a critic who embraced diverse cinema.

'Star Wars' Saga: An Enduring Love Affair

Ebert liked many films deeply. One was the original 'Star Wars' trilogy. He gave all three films high ratings–'A New Hope', 'The Empire Strikes Back', and 'Return of the Jedi'. He even said 'A New Hope' was a "Great Movie". He believed 'The Empire Strikes Back' was perhaps the best. His affection for the trilogy showed even discerning critics can be captivated.

Ebert's Critical Lens: Style, Substance, and Impact

Roger Ebert was a true film critic. He brought Midwestern charm and humanist values to his writing. His style made complex ideas accessible to everyone. He won a Pulitzer Prize in 1975, becoming the first film critic to achieve this honor. This solidified his place as a major force in American criticism.

The Ebert Style: Accessible Expertise

Ebert's style contributed to his appeal. He avoided academic jargon, opting for clear prose that was informative and engaging. He wrote as if conversing, sharing insights in an approachable manner. This style, combined with his critical eye, made him a trusted guide for moviegoers.

Pulitzer Prize Recognition: A Landmark Achievement

The Pulitzer in 1975 was transformative for Ebert and film criticism as a whole. It legitimized film criticism as journalism. It recognized the cultural significance of cinema. Ebert's Pulitzer was a testament to his dedication and impact on how people viewed movies.

Ebert: The Man Behind the Reviews

Roger Ebert was more than reviews and stars. He had a full life, personality, and journey. Born in 1942, he lived 70 impactful years, passing away in 2013 after battling cancer. His life, relationship with wife Chaz, and professional partnerships shaped his journey.

Life and Legacy: Beyond Cinema

Ebert's journey faced challenges. His battle with cancer was well-known, faced with courage. Despite health setbacks, he kept writing, reviewing, and engaging with cinema until the end. His resilience inspired just as much as his insights.

Chaz Ebert: Partner in Life and Legacy

Ebert's marriage to Chaz Hammelsmith in 1992 marked a significant chapter. Chaz became his partner and steward of his legacy after his passing. Ebert embraced her children as his own, expanding and enriching his family life.

Siskel & Ebert: The Great Debates

Ebert's partnership with Gene Siskel was legendary. Their on-screen chemistry brought on contentious debates fueled by their love for movies. While they were not best friends off-screen, they respected each other deeply. Their "thumbs up, thumbs down" became shorthand for recommendations.

Education and Aspirations: From Journalism to Film

Ebert's criticism path began with education and a writing passion. He earned a journalism degree at the University of Illinois and pursued a Ph.D. in English before focusing on writing solely. His academic background shaped his critical approach and broad understanding.

Last Words and Final Resting Place

In a dramatic moment, Ebert's last words were from Shakespeare: "Life is but a tale, told by an idiot." This reflection on mortality adds complexity to Ebert’s enigma. His service occurred at Graceland Cemetery; he was cremated, possibly keeping ashes with Chaz for a private farewell.

Financial Success and Fame: The Rewards of Passion

Ebert’s success stemmed from passion and dedication. His estimated net worth was $10 million due to his decades as a critic and author. His fame resulted from financial success but also his Pulitzer Prize and long-running TV show, alongside engaging writing.

RogerEbert.com: A Digital Archive

After his death, Ebert's voice continued through RogerEbert.com. This website launched in 2002, run by Chaz and editors, as a valuable archive of his reviews. It testament serves to his lasting legacy, ensuring his critical voice remains accessible for generations.

Chaz Ebert's Stewardship: Keeping the Flame Alive

Chaz Ebert’s role in maintaining RogerEbert.com is vital. She preserved his vast work and expanded the site to include reviews from other critics. This keeps it relevant for film lovers everywhere.

discussion. She is his cinematic guardian, keeping the flame alive.

A Treasure Trove of Reviews: Ebert's Enduring Voice

RogerEbert.com is a site and a time capsule. It holds film history through the eyes of a great critic. Whether you want insights on classics or hidden gems, RogerEbert.com offers essential content for any film lover.

The Everlasting Debate: What Makes a "Best" Movie?

The "best" movie is subjective. What one person loves, another may not. Ebert recognized this. His opinions sparked ongoing discussions about the "best" films, fueled by personal tastes, critical views, and cultural influence.

The Pantheon of "Greatest" Films: A Subjective Selection

All-Star Cast Spectacles: The Ensemble Extravaganza

Movies featuring all-star casts, like 'The Expendables', 'Tropic Thunder', and 'Love Actually', hold unique appeal. They often focus on entertainment and star power, showcasing famous faces. While not all received accolades, they remain fun spectacles with talented ensembles.

Box Office Titans: The Reign of 'Avatar'

'Avatar', directed by James Cameron, ranks as the highest-grossing film ever. Its box office triumph stems from stunning visuals and immersive storytelling. Box office success does not always equal critical praise. Yet 'Avatar' shows cinematic spectacle's ability to draw global audiences.

Crowd-Pleasing Favorites: The Beloved Films

Films like 'Forrest Gump', 'The Godfather', and 'Titanic' claim spots among the most liked movies. 'Forrest Gump' is often "America's favorite movie." These films connect emotionally, providing both entertainment and relatability. They act as cinematic comfort food, inviting repeated viewings.

Navigating the Cinematic Landscape: Ratings and Recommendations

Movie ratings guide viewers but remain subjective. They differ across platforms. Ebert's four-star system or Common Sense Media's five-star model offers film evaluation frameworks. However, your taste should be your guiding principle.

The Subjectivity of "Best": Taste is Personal

No definitive answer exists for the "best" movie. Viewing experiences, culture, and personal taste shape preferences. One person's masterpiece may bore another. Accept this subjectivity and trust your own views.

Rating Systems: A Guide, Not Gospel

Rating methods, like Ebert's four-star scale or Common Sense Media's five-star system, help gauge opinions but should not be followed blindly. A three-star rating, labeled "Just fine; solid," may mean different things to various viewers. Use ratings as starting points but explore further and read reviews.

The Myth of the 10-Star Movie: Beyond Perfection?

Many dream of a 10-star film. However, established systems typically max out at four or five stars. Movies like 'The Shawshank Redemption', 'The Godfather', and 'Forrest Gump' spark talks about "perfect" films. Even these seldom reach a theoretical 10-star rating. Art perfection eludes us, even among the greatest films.

Roger Ebert's journey unfolded with passion and insight, spurring his love for movies. His reviews and legacy shape our film views. Grab popcorn, dim the lights, and let Ebert guide you through the vast world of cinema.