Movie Outlines - Backstage, Briefs, Movie reviews and ratings by Film CriticDaily Dose Of Entertainment

The Circle Review: Social Media’s Promise and the Dystopia Beneath

The Circle: When Social Media Dreams Turn into Nightmares Have you ever dreamed of landing that perfect job? Mae Holland, played by Emma Watson in “The Circle,” has. She enters the vivid world of “The Circle,” a tech giant that outshines Google and Facebook. At first, it looks like a golden ticket, a way out […]

The Circle Review: Social Media’s Promise and the Dystopia Beneath

The Circle: When Social Media Dreams Turn into Nightmares

Have you ever dreamed of landing that perfect job? Mae Holland, played by Emma Watson in "The Circle," has. She enters the vivid world of "The Circle," a tech giant that outshines Google and Facebook. At first, it looks like a golden ticket, a way out of the mundane.

But hang tight. This isn’t your typical career story. "The Circle," based on Dave Eggers's novel, dives into privacy, ethics, and the dark side of connectivity. Picture a world where every click, conversation, and thought might be controlled. Sounds like sci-fi? "The Circle" claims we may be closer to that than we think.

Let's explore "The Circle" and figure out what went wrong. Was it a noble failure, or did it just fall flat? Let's analyze this digital drama.

Unpacking the Plot: From Dream Job to Existential Dread

The plot of "The Circle" is simple yet profound. Mae Holland, in search of stability, lands a job at The Circle. This isn't just any firm; it’s the firm, dominating tech and social media. Imagine a company mixing Google, Facebook, Apple, and cult-like corporate culture, and you have The Circle.

The initial summary shows opportunity:

Mae Holland (Emma Watson) sees a chance of a lifetime at the most powerful tech and social media firm. Encouraged by the founder (Tom Hanks), she joins an experiment pushing privacy, ethics, and personal freedom limits. Her decisions impact her friends, family, and humanity.

Another summary clarifies:

A woman starts her dream job at a powerful tech firm, uncovering an agenda that threatens all humanity.

This version hints at tension. Mae's dream role turns nightmarish as she finds a plan that endangers not just her life, but the core of society. It's a classic plot: a perfect facade hiding something disturbing.

Now, let's break down the main elements:

Mae's Entry into The Circle's World

For Mae, working at The Circle isn't mere career advancement; it’s a lifeline. The synopsis states:

When Mae joins the largest tech and social media company, she sees an opportunity of a lifetime.

This job offers security, purpose, and a way out of monotony. It's the hope for something great. Mae remains unaware; she enters a gilded cage.

The Experiment: Privacy Under the Microscope

The film's central conflict revolves around an experiment challenging privacy and ethics. As the synopsis reveals:

Encouraged by the founder (Tom Hanks), Mae joins an experiment pushing privacy, ethics, and freedom limits.

This experiment lacks a clear name but drives the story. It’s about transparency and eliminating secrets, living under observation, and sharing everything. Liberating? "The Circle" raises doubts.

Ripple Effects: Humanity on the Line

Mae's choices within this experiment bring widespread consequences. The synopsis warns:

Mae's participation in the experiment affects her friends, family, and humanity’s future.

This isn't just Mae's story; it's about society's fate. The experiment can redefine interactions, privacy, and control humanity's future. High stakes indeed.

The Circle: A Social Media Hunger Games?

A curveball appears with "The Circle," hinting at a social media competition. This seems linked to TV shows, not the movie plot. Nevertheless, it introduces:

Part reality show and part game show, the series shows contestants living alone and competing via social media for a prize of $100,000.

This competition mirrors themes of surveillance and performance in "The Circle." Contestants fight for popularity in a monitored environment, resembling Mae's company experience. It's social media turned into a high-stakes game, where authenticity suffers.

Catfish Alert! Trust No One (Online)

The brief mentions a twist in the competition:

But the catch is that some aren’t who they claim to be. Catfish exist.

This “catfish” idea emphasizes online identity dangers. It reflects the movie’s themes of authenticity. In a world of visibility, manipulation and hidden motives thrive.

Themes and Messages: Peeling Back the Digital Layers

"The Circle" serves as a thriller, a commentary, and a cautionary tale. It engages with heavy themes relevant in today’s digital world.

Transparency vs. Privacy: The Ultimate Showdown

The central conflict focuses on one essential question:

The theme of The Circle is transparency versus privacy.

The film illustrates a world where transparency is demanded, where privacy is seen as suspicious. The mantra is "secrets are lies, sharing is caring," taken too far. But is full transparency truly good? Is privacy a human right crucial for freedom and societal health?

Critique of Social Networking Culture: Are We Oversharing?

"The Circle" critiques the social networking culture. As noted:

In The Circle, Eggers satirizes the cultures that arose with the Internet, especially social networking where interactions happen online, often between strangers.

The film questions online interaction authenticity and how real connections fade in a digital world. Are we trading real relationships for superficial likes? Does constant connectivity enrich us or isolate us despite being connected?

Satire of Internet Culture: Laughing to Keep from Crying?

The satirical edge of "The Circle" strengthens its message. The brief notes this:

In The Circle, Eggers satirizes cultures that emerged during the Internet age.

Through exaggeration and dark humor, the movie mocks tech industry's utopian promises and relentless data pursuit. It showcases anxieties about technology's reach and our choices.

direction of our digital lives.

Implications of Complete Social Transparency: Nowhere to Hide

The movie examines consequences of complete social transparency. As described in the brief:

“The Circle” is a thriller. It is about a tech company connecting everyone online and its implications. The story is based on David Eggers' 2013 novel.

Imagine a world without secrets. Every aspect of life is visible. Sounds nightmarish for privacy advocates, right? "The Circle" shows the chilling impacts of this reality. It emphasizes loss of personal autonomy and increased social pressure. Surveillance could become the norm.

Dangers of Technology in Human Interaction: Wedges Between Us

"The Circle" shows that technology can promise connection while driving us apart. The brief notes:

The novel depicts technology creating wedges in interaction by replacing face-to-face interaction with online personas. Mae struggles to maintain healthy relationships, as her life is mediated through a webcam and other devices.

The movie shows Mae's struggle with The Circle's digital culture. Her relationships with family and friends suffer. Her online persona overshadows her real self. Are our relationships enhanced by technology, or is it eroding intimacy and empathy?

Critical Reception and Flaws: Why Did "The Circle" Fall Flat?

Poor Execution of a Strong Concept: Great Idea, Fumbled Delivery

Critics argue that "The Circle" failed to explore its potential thoroughly. The brief states:

It flopped mainly due to failing to explore its premise about privacy and corporate surveillance, suffering from a weak script and uneven pacing, also lacking tension despite its strong cast, leading to an unsatisfying viewing experience.

Compelling concept: a tech company with total surveillance is indeed fascinating, but the film struggled to create a meaningful narrative with character development.

The core concept of total transparency and its consequences is relevant and thought-provoking. Yet, the film's execution fell short. Issues with the script, directing, pacing, and character development led to a disappointing cinematic experience. This is an example of a brilliant idea losing its essence during adaptation.

Weak Script and Bad Directing: Lost in Translation?

The brief highlights the screenplay and direction as major problems:

Waste of talent due to lackluster script and direction.

This harsh critique aligns with the critical consensus. The screenplay lacked depth and nuance. It didn't delve into complex issues effectively. The directing did not build tension or create narrative flow. Even talented actors like Emma Watson and Tom Hanks cannot save a movie with these issues.

Uneven Pacing: Too Much Setup, Not Enough Payoff

Pacing was another significant criticism:

Many reviewers pointed out that the movie spent too much time establishing its world and insufficient time developing the plot and consequences.

The movie dedicates considerable time to The Circle's culture and Mae's immersion into it. However, it inadequately develops conflict and its results. The plot progresses too quickly in its later parts, leading to an abrupt ending. It's akin to a rollercoaster with a long initial ascent but a disappointing descent.

Underdeveloped Characters: Cardboard Cutouts in a Digital World?

Character development posed another issue:

Despite a talented cast, characters often felt flat and lacked emotional complexity to engage audiences.

Talented actors could not uplift hollow characters in "The Circle." Mae faces critiques for being passive rather than assertive in the story. Supporting characters also lack depth. Without relatable characters, it's hard for viewers to invest in the film's themes and conflicts.

Lack of Suspense: Where's the Thrill in This Thriller?

Despite being marketed as a thriller, "The Circle" lacks suspense:

The film is criticized for failing to effectively explore privacy and corporate surveillance while suffering from numerous flaws leading to an unsatisfying viewing experience.

A mere 15 percent Rotten Tomatoes score reflects this bleak reality.

A thriller must keep viewers engaged, but "The Circle" failed to instill this feeling. Critics state that the narrative lacked tension. The stakes felt low, preventing genuine suspense. Often, it's like witnessing an inevitable car crash from miles away – predictable and underwhelming.

Screenplay Shallowness: Surface Level Exploration

The screenplay's faults include shallow thematic exploration:

The screenplay's limitations include a lack of depth in character motivations. It failed to adequately explore the complexities it presented to viewers.

While "The Circle" raises questions about privacy and surveillance, it does not dive deep into these issues. Its presentation of themes appears simplistic and superficial, missing the complexities inherent in transparency versus privacy debates.

One-Dimensional Characters: Hollow Vessels for Ideas?

The lack of character depth contributes to the film's flaws:

Despite talented actors, characters feel one-dimensional without emotional complexity needed to engage audiences.

Characters in "The Circle" often act as mouthpieces for themes instead of fully realized individuals. They lack psychological depth to connect with their struggles or fates. This barrier hampers audience connection with their journeys.

Bleak Vision Already Exists: Too Real to be Shocking?

Ironically, one reason for the film's failure might be its unsettling realism:

The Circle flopped because its bleak vision already exists in reality.

"The Circle's" vision of constant surveillance feels less shocking due to our world dominated by social media and data collection. Audiences might perceive it as less of a cautionary tale and more a grim reflection of reality. Chilling dystopias often resonate with familiarity.

Characters in the Circle: Pawns and Players in the Game of Transparency

Despite criticism over character development, let's delve into it further.

Take a closer look at key figures in "The Circle." Their roles impact the narrative.

Mae Holland: From Idealist to Instrument?

Mae Holland, played by Emma Watson, is the protagonist. She is our entry into The Circle's world. Initially, she appears as an ordinary young woman seeking a better life. However, her journey takes a disturbing turn.

Loyalty to The Circle: Blind Faith or Corporate Brainwashing?

Mae’s loyalty to The Circle causes problems as the story progresses. The brief states:

As Mae grows loyal, readers see she is a pawn.

Her initial enthusiasm becomes blind faith in The Circle’s ideology. She advocates for transparency, even sacrificing her privacy and others'. Is this true conviction? Or is she indoctrinated by corporate culture?

Mae as a Pawn: Manipulated and Used

The brief clarifies Mae's role as a pawn in The Circle's game:

As Mae grows loyal to the Circle, it’s clear she is a pawn. The executives use her as their poster child and manipulator.

Mae is strategically utilized by The Circle's leadership. She embodies their values and promotes their agenda for transparency. Her every action is curated to influence public opinion and normalize privacy erosion. She becomes a corporate puppet, often unaware.

Emma Watson: Beyond Acting, a Multifaceted Talent

Emma Watson's casting as Mae brings star power to "The Circle." But beyond acting, Watson explores filmmaking.

Current Status in Acting: Taking a Break, Exploring New Avenues

The brief details her current career trajectory:

No, she hasn’t quit acting. She takes a break while exploring film industry aspects.

While not retired, Watson steps back to pursue creative avenues. This reveals her desire to expand beyond performing and impact filmmaking.

Directing and Producing: Behind the Camera

Watson's exploration of directing and producing shows deeper engagement:

She explores writing, directing, and producing.

She made her directorial debut in 2022 with a Prada Paradoxe short film.

Her ventures into writing and directing signal a wish for creative control and broader storytelling impact. Her directorial debut indicates a commitment to refining her skills behind the camera.

Mae's Parents: Collateral Damage in the Transparency Revolution

Mae's family plays a vital role in showing The Circle's human cost.

Father's Multiple Sclerosis: Vulnerability Exposed

Mae's father's illness serves as plot symbolism in a world demanding visibility. The brief notes:

Mae takes the job to support her parents, especially her father with multiple sclerosis. Mercer shows less support.

They struggle with the healthcare system post-diagnosis.

Mae's reason for joining The Circle partly stems from wanting better healthcare for her father. This vulnerability intertwines with The Circle's agenda; her family's struggles become exposed under transparency. Their healthcare system navigation before The Circle indicates real-world challenges that may worsen under corporate claims.

The Joker's Role: A Glitch in the System?

The brief mentions "The Joker" within "The Circle" context. Likely a reference to a character from the reality TV series, it also has metaphorical significance in the movie.

Courtney is in The Inner Circle and influences the game. He reveals his secret identity "The Joker." "The Joker" advises new players not to trust Chloe and Terilisha.

"The Joker" represents hidden influence in the reality show. In the movie, this could symbolize deception within The Circle's narrative. There may be "Jokers" within the company with hidden agendas who exploit the system for their gain amidst presumed transparency.

Moral and Ethical Implications: Navigating the Gray Areas of Transparency

"The Circle" poses moral dilemmas, prompting viewers to confront issues about privacy and surveillance.

Transparency versus Privacy: A Moral Tightrope

The central conflict centers on the tension between transparency and privacy. As echoed in the brief:

The Circle’s theme is transparency versus privacy.

The movie lacks easy answers. It shows a world where transparency is seen as virtuous while privacy is vilified as hiding wrongs. Is this viewpoint valid? Are transparency and privacy exclusive? Or is there balance?

Privacy as the Enemy: Bailey's Extreme Viewpoint

The character Bailey articulates an extreme anti-privacy stance:

Onstage, Bailey states privacy is the enemy. Monitoring will stop dictators from violating rights and protect children from abusers.

This reflects a utilitarian view for complete transparency. Constant surveillance is deemed necessary for deterring harm and promoting good. Bailey argues it creates safety and justice. This perspective raises serious ethical issues about pervasive surveillance costs.

Privacy Concerns: The Dark Side of "Knowing Everything"

The Circle's utopian claims implicitly raise privacy issues:

“The Circle” film flopped for failing to explore corporate surveillance and privacy effectively.

The criticism highlights significant concerns: corporate surveillance and privacy erosion. "The Circle" warns against overlooking individual freedom at the expense of collective monitoring. It pushes us to consider manipulation and control possibilities in a fully tracked society.

Comparisons and Inspirations: Echoes of Reality

"The Circle" derives from existing tech companies, mirroring real-world anxieties about the digital age.

Based on Dave Eggers' Novel: Literary Origins

The movie roots itself in Dave Eggers' 2013 novel. As emphasized:

“The Circle,” directed by James Ponsoldt, is a thriller about a tech company connecting everyone online. It covers complete social transparency implications based on a 2013 novel by David Eggers.

The movie, based on Dave Eggers’ novel about a Google-like tech giant, disappoints.

Ponsoldt's film has good ideas but never finds a groove, ending unsatisfactorily.

The film "The Circle," based on Eggers’ 2013 novel, portrays Silicon Valley with realistic themes.

The novel provides the material, framework, and characters for adaptation. While adaptations often diverge, "The Circle" attempts to convey Eggers’s cautionary tale on technology and privacy. The connections suggest its central place in the narrative structure.

importance in understanding the movie's intentions and themes.

Similarities to Google and Facebook: Veiled Analogies

The Circle, a fictional tech giant, mirrors real-world companies like Google and Facebook. The brief hints at this connection:

It is based 75% on Google and 25% on Facebook, but who's counting?

The movie draws from Dave Eggers's novel about a Google-like tech giant.

The Circle dominates search, social media, and various digital services. This dominance reflects the real-world influence of companies like Google and Facebook. Analogies ground the movie's dystopian vision, making it relatable and unsettling. The film comments on the potential trajectory of existing tech trends taken to extremes.

Fictional Silicon Valley: A Familiar Landscape of Innovation and Excess

"The Circle" is set in a fictionalized Silicon Valley, a place known for technological innovation and corporate power. The brief notes:

The Circle, based on the 2013 novel by Dave Eggers, portrays a fictional Silicon Valley with realistic themes and foreboding conclusions.

By placing the story in Silicon Valley, the movie taps into perceptions of the tech industry. It highlights its utopian aspirations, disruptive technologies, and potential for unchecked power. The setting allows for exaggeration of Silicon Valley culture. This serves satirical and cautionary purposes while maintaining plausibility.

Movie Details: Behind the Scenes of "The Circle"

Let’s take a brief detour to explore details about the movie's production and setting.

Filming Locations in California: Capturing the Golden State

The majority of filming for "The Circle" took place in California. The state provided diverse landscapes and iconic locations. The brief specifies:

Filming locations were in California. Key areas included the Art Center College of Design, Pasadena, Manhattan Beach, the Angeles Crest Highway, and the Golden Gate Bridge.

These locations, from urban settings to natural backdrops, enrich the story visually. The Golden Gate Bridge grounds the fictional world of The Circle in recognizable reality, blurring lines between fiction and present technology.

The Circle Apartments: Luxury in Manchester, England?

Interestingly, the brief reveals the apartments for The Circle's virtual world were filmed in Manchester, England:

Adelphi Wharf Phase One, a luxury apartment in Salford, Manchester, serves as the backdrop for The Circle's virtual world.

This is unexpected, given the movie's California setting. It highlights the global nature of the film industry and creative choices in production. Using a luxury apartment in England adds visual interest and hints at the artificiality of The Circle's utopian vision.

Endings and Interpretations: Ambiguity and Uncertainty

The brief mentions a reference to the ending of another movie, "How It Ends." It offers a useful concept for interpreting "The Circle." This open ending relates to ambiguous resolutions.

Open Ending: Leaving Questions Unanswered

An example from "How It Ends" illustrates the concept:

In "How It Ends," Will (Theo James) drives away from a volcanic ash cloud with Samantha (Kat Graham) amidst a disastrous scene. Their survival remains ambiguous.

An open ending avoids definitive answers. It leaves lingering questions for the audience to ponder possible outcomes. While the brief doesn’t mention an open ending in "The Circle," this concept aids in understanding the film's impact and message.

Uncertain Future for Characters: Survival or Subjugation?

The open ending in "How It Ends" features uncertainty about the characters’ fates:

No resolution: The film does not specify whether Will and Samantha survive, leaving the ending open to interpretation.

This uncertainty also applies to interpreting "The Circle." Its conclusion may not provide a clear resolution to the ethical dilemmas faced by characters.

K
WRITTEN BY

Karla S.

Responses (0 )