Movie Outlines - Backstage, Briefs, Movie reviews and ratings by Film CriticDaily Dose Of Entertainment

Time and Money: A Review of “In Time” and Its Dystopian World

Ever thought about a world where time equals money? Not in the metaphorical sense your boss uses. We’re talking about real minutes ticking away from your life. Buckle up. That’s the wild idea behind the 2011 sci-fi movie, “In Time”. The Clock is Ticking, Literally: Unpacking “In Time”‘s Core Concept Picture this: you reach 25, […]

Time and Money: A Review of “In Time” and Its Dystopian World

Ever thought about a world where time equals money? Not in the metaphorical sense your boss uses. We're talking about real minutes ticking away from your life. Buckle up. That's the wild idea behind the 2011 sci-fi movie, "In Time".

The Clock is Ticking, Literally: Unpacking "In Time"'s Core Concept

Picture this: you reach 25, peak condition, looking great. Fantastic, right? But here’s the twist! Your biological clock stops aging at 25 and starts counting down. You can only live another year unless you have time. In "In Time", time is currency. Work? Paid in time. Groceries? Time. Rent? Time. The wealthy live almost forever, hoarding decades, while others struggle for hours to survive.

This goes beyond rich yachts; it's created inequality. The film shows a future where “living on borrowed time” means something dire. The rich aren't just richer; they drain life force from the poor, and in "In Time", it's disturbingly literal.

From Factory Worker to Time Bandit: Navigating the Plot of "In Time"

Meet Will Salas, played by Justin Timberlake. Will is an average guy struggling daily as his wrist clock ticks down. He works in a factory, where every moment counts. His life changes when he meets Henry Hamilton, played by Matt Bomer. Hamilton has plenty of time, centuries to be precise, and is tired of his eternal life. Out of existential generosity, Hamilton gives Will his entire fortune – a century of life.

Will's concerns change; he now has a century to worry about. But such a big transfer of time draws attention. The authorities, represented by the relentless Timekeepers, start investigating. When Will gets framed for murder, he has to flee. He drags along Sylvia Weis, daughter of a time tycoon, played by Amanda Seyfried. It's like a stylish kidnapping that turns into something bigger.

The movie doesn't wrap up neatly. Will and Sylvia become modern-day rebels, like Robin Hood but with time instead of money. They rob time banks, giving hours to the needy to echo Will's father’s actions. They are not merely criminals; they're social bandits in a time-divided world.

Time is Money, and Other Deep Thoughts: Exploring the Themes of "In Time"

"In Time" isn't just another slick sci-fi flick; it has messages about capitalism. The film shouts "capitalism gone wild." It shows that unchecked economic inequality is life-threatening. It's a representation of Marxist ideas, where time is controlled by few, leading to class struggle.

Besides its socio-economic commentary, it reflects on the value of time itself. Time is precious; don’t waste it. "In Time" emphasizes this as every second is literally life. It stresses that no one should die young so others can live in luxury. Appreciate the time you have, even if it's not bought with Starbucks.

However, "In Time" explores some murky topics too. It glorifies youth and beauty in typical Hollywood fashion. Everyone is perpetually 25 and focuses on attractive leads. It touches upon our fear of death and desire for immortality, but these themes get overshadowed by action and thefts.

Then there's the morality of our protagonists. Will and Sylvia rob from the rich to aid the poor; noble enough, right? But roles blur as they continue. Who gets to decide who deserves more time? Do they become judges of life? The film doesn’t provide straight answers. This ambiguity raises questions about means justifying ends and if Robin Hood tactics are sustainable or just chaos.

Amid the heists, there's a quieter point about living here and now. The film suggests that whether you've plenty of time or barely enough, how you spend it matters most. Spend it wisely with loved ones doing meaningful things. A poignant scene with Will and his friend hits home – it's about quality over quantity.

Critical Clock Watch: How "In Time" Was Received

Critics had mixed feelings. "In Time" didn't receive unanimous love or hate; it settled somewhere in between. Many praised its premise – time as currency is a gripping idea. It grabs attention instantly but the execution faltered.

The common view seemed to be "interesting idea, poorly executed." The concept was fresh but the film didn’t quite meet expectations. Some critics felt it devolved into mere action sequences and romance, losing the depth it initially promised. Timberlake and Seyfried had mixed reviews; they sometimes felt lost in a script that ran out of steam. The Bonnie and Clyde-style ending felt like a lazy fallback when complexity became overwhelming.

Dystopia, Time Cops, and Vault Raids: Key Ingredients of "In Time"

The setting matters and "In Time" nails dystopia. The world is visually divided economically. Wealthy zones are timeless while poor live in grim ghettos. This disparity reinforces the theme of inequality, making it feel real and unsettling.

Raymond Leon is the chief Timekeeper, played by Cillian Murphy. He acts as an antagonist, but not in a clichéd manner. He’s a relentless figure, upholding a broken system. His belief in the system adds to his unsettling nature.

The climax leads us to the Weis family’s time vault, hoarding wealth openly. Will and Sylvia discover more than riches; they unveil extensive societal corruption here. It’s not just about rich folks having plenty; it's about keeping the masses robbed of time to allow others to live indefinitely. This vault moment marks where the film’s critique peaks.

Echoes of Time: Connections to Other Stories

"In Time" draws literary inspiration too. Harlan Ellison claimed it heavily borrowed from his 1965 short story “Repent, Harlequin! Said The Ticktockman.” Both stories explore time control themes and rebellion against a time-obsessed world, though Ellison felt "In Time" missed nuances of his original work. This connection adds layers to the film's conceptual framework.

As many critics pointed out, the

The latter part of "In Time" uses the Bonnie and Clyde trope. Will and Sylvia rob time banks. They become romanticized outlaws. They fight against the system, with questionable methods and a high body count. This connection offers a familiar narrative. However, it simplifies the film's complex themes, leading to mixed critical reception.

A Different Kind of Time Travel: A Quick Look at "About Time"

"In Time" shows a dystopia where time is currency. Now, let's contrast it with another time-themed movie, "About Time." This rom-com features a time-travel twist. It focuses on relationships and choices, not critiques. The central theme is about appreciating moments.

In the end, Tim from "About Time" decides to stop using time travel. He sees true happiness isn't about fixing everything. It's about embracing life's reality, flaws and fleeting moments. This presents a gentler perspective on time compared to the adrenaline-fueled commentary of "In Time."

So, is "In Time" a perfect movie? No. It has flaws. But, it offers a thought-provoking exploration of time and inequality. It questions what it means to truly live. Sometimes, that matters more than all the time in the world.

S
WRITTEN BY

Sebastien Levy

Responses (0 )